The Socio-Economic Rights and
Accountability Project on Tuesday asked a Federal High Court in Lagos to
compel the Central Bank of Nigeria to name the persons funding the Boko
Haram sect.
The group, in a suit marked
FHC/L/CS/1547/2014, argued that it would only be fair for the CBN to
expose the sponsors in the light of the unlawful killings of innocent
Nigerians and the continued destruction of properties by the insurgents.
SERAP explained that the suit was
necessitated by the alleged refusal of the CBN Governor, Godwin
Emefiele, to oblige its request for the list, Boko Haram sponsors
identified in line with the Freedom of Information Bill.
It further argued that the continued
denial by the CBN was in opposition to social justice since “the subject
matter bothers on an issue of national interest, public peace and
security, public concern, social justice, good governance, transparency
and accountability.”
It insisted that the CBN had nothing to lose if the information was made available to it.
According to the group, being a public
institution, the CBN is legally bound to oblige its request for
information on the persons who allegedly laundered money through the
bank for the purpose of sponsoring the Boko Haram sect.
In its originating summons, SERAP
argued, “By virtue of Section 4 (a) of the FOI Act, when a person makes a
request for information from a public official, institution or agency,
the public official, institution or agency to whom the application is
directed is under a binding legal obligation to provide the plaintiff
with the information requested for, except as otherwise provided by the
Act, within seven days after the application is received.
“The information requested for by the
plaintiff does not come within the purview of the types of information
exempted from disclosure by the provisions of the FOI Act.
“CBN has so far failed, refused and/or neglected to provide the plaintiff with the details of the information requested.
“By virtue of Section 1(1) of the FOI
Act 2011, the plaintiff is entitled as of right to request for or gain
access to information which is in the custody or possession of any
public official, agency or institution.”
No date has yet been fixed for the hearing of the suit.
punchng
.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
We are very happy for your comments